The Effect of Cosmetic Procedures for Facial Rejuvenation on The Quality of Life and Self Esteem (Botulinum Toxin Overview)

Eman M. Sanad1, Sherein H. Abdoulrahman2, Talah M. Akkari3*

1Department of Dermatology and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:Talah M. Akkari, Department of Dermatology and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt, Tel: 010-2717-1145; Fax: 010-2717-1145

Citation: Eman M Sanad, Sherein H Abdoulrahman, Talah M Akkari (2024) The Effect of Cosmetic Procedures for Facial Rejuvenation on The Quality of Life and Self Esteem (Botulinum Toxin Overview). Cancer Prog Diagn 8: 148.

Received: May 14, 2024; Accepted: May 23, 2024; Published: May 26, 2024.

Copyright: © 2024: Eman M Sanad, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

When there are disfiguring facial lesions, the overall emotional well-being of an individual can be significantly affected, contributing to a decrease in social functioning, productivity at work or school and lowered self-esteem.  We to assess the level of self-esteem and degree of satisfaction in patients who went through cosmetic procedure using self-answered questionnaire.  One thousand volunteers were included in this study. They were of both sexes, aged from 20 -70 years. All participants should have had a past experience of at least one cosmetic procedure.

Results

Most volunteers supported the cosmetic procedures. Some of them were supportive due to improvement of the quality of life, others were interested by self- assurance which led them to be bolder and handle with others and have happier marital life.  Aesthetic procedures improve the quality of life and self-esteem of most of the volunteers. A respectable number of the populations are seeking for cosmetic procedures; hence dermatologists have to have more information about cosmetic procedures, their proper application, indications, contraindications and side effects. Looking for cheaper, less painful and more prolonged effect of cosmetic procedures is required. On the other hand, Botox was the most frequent procedure done by Saudi volunteers as the largest category of them was at the age range of 40-50 years where nearly all of them have dynamic wrinkles and at the same time can afford the expenses of Botox.

Botulinum toxin-upper face is used mostly in (Glabella wrinkles, Lateral canthal lines, Forehead lines, and Upper nasal bunny lines).

We will discuss botulinum toxin types, diluation, injecting techniques, tricks, recommendation, contraindications and disadvantages.

 

Age

Mean

 

The first axis:  Cosmetic procedures to restore youth face

 

from 20 to less than 30 years

 4.14

.53

from 30 to less than 40 years

 3.70

.51

from 40 to less than 50 years

3.65 

.62

from 50 years and over

3.57 

.59

Total

3.70 

.60

The second axis:  Impact cosmetic procedures to restore youth face on quality of life

 

from 20 to less than 30 years

3.79 

.48

from 30 to less than 40 years

 3.56

.53

from 40 to less than 50 years

3.76 

.61

from 50 years and over

3.63 

.57

Total

3.68 

.58

 The third axis:  The effect of cosmetic procedures to restore youth face on self-esteem

 

from 20 to less than 30 years

4.01 

.50

from 30 to less than 40 years

 3.56

.40

from 40 to less than 50 years

3.73 

.62

from 50 years and over

3.61 

.48

Total

3.69 

.54

Total

 

from 20 to less than 30 years

 3.98

.47

from 30 to less than 40 years

 3.61

.43

from 40 to less than 50 years

3.72 

.59

from 50 years and over

3.60 

.50

Total

3.69 

.53

 

 

References

  1. Goldman A, Wollina U (2010) Facial rejuvenation fpr middle-aged women: a combined approach with minimally invasive procedures. Clin Interv Aging 5:293-299.
  2. De Aquino MS, Hadad A, Ferreira LM (2013) Assessment of quality of life in patients who underwent minimally invasive cosmetic procedure. Springer 37: 497-503.
  3. Bickers RB, Athar M (2006) Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of skin disease. J Invest Dermatol 126: 2565-2575.
  4. Anderson RT, Rajagopalan R (1997) Development and validation of a quality-of-life instrument for cutaneous diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 37: 41–50.
  5. Knapp RG, Clinton MM (1992) Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore: 43-44.
  6. Demas PN, Braun TW (2001) Esthetic facial surgery for women. Dent Clin North Am 45: 555-569.
  7. Glogau R (1994) Chemical peeling and aging skin. J Geriatr Dermatol 2: 30-35.
  8. Serri R, Iorizzo M (2008) Combating aging skin. Clin DermatoL 26 :105.
  9. Ruetzler T, Taylor J, Reynolds D, Baker W, Killen C (2012) What is professional attire today? A conjoint analysis of personal presentation attributes. Int J Hospit Mana 31: 937-943.
  10. Frederick DA, Reynolds TA, Fales MR, Garcia JR (2012) Physical attractiveness: Dating, mating, and social interaction. Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance 629-635.
  11. Ree JS, Larrabee WF (2013) Facing levels of evidence: The JAMA facial plastic surgery initiative. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:174-175.
  12. Grimes P (1995) Melasma: etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Arch Dermatol Surg Oncol 131: 1453-1457.
  13. Donohoe M (2011) Women's health in context: Cosmetic surgery and future: Scope, ethics, and policy. Medscape Ob/Gyn.
  14. Benedetto AV (2006) Cosmetic uses of botulinum toxin A in the upper face. Benedetto AV (Ed), 1st ed. Taylor & Francies Group 37-49.