INTEGRATA GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA (IGO)

Organizational Trust and Commitment Among Nurse Managers



NemaFathy Saad1*, Hanaa Mohamed Abd rabou1


1Lecturers of Nursing Administration Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:NemaFathy Saad, Lecturer of Nursing Administration Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University, Egypt, ;TEL::0224041859 ; FAX::0224041859;E-mail:dr.nanasaad@yahoo.com


Citation: NemaFathy Saad, Hanaa Mohamed Abd rabou (2016) Organizational Trust and Commitment Among Nurse Managers.IntegrataGinecologia e obstetrician2016 1: 103.


Copyright: © 2016 NemaFathy Saad, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Received date:November 30, 2016; Accepted date:December 10, 2016; Published date:December 26, 2016


Abstract

The main purpose of this research is reviewing the relationship between organizational trust and the three dimensions of organizational commitment including (affective commitment, continuance commitment and normative commitment) the method of this research is descriptive, correlational, and its statistical sample is included 98 nurse managers. Working in wards at Ain Shams University Hospitals (El-demerdash Hospital, University Hospital, Pediatrics Hospital, and Obstetric Hospital). Data collection tools used through this research was Rudder’s (2003) Trust Organizational Questionnaire (TOQ) and Meyer & Allen’s (1997) Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ).The correlations were used to analyze the obtained data; As a result of this research it has been revealed that there is a highly statistically significant positive correlation between organizational trust and the three dimensions of organizational commitment.


Keywords:

Organizational trust, Organizational commitment, Nurse managers


Introduction

Organizational trust is a necessary element for employees’ safety feeling and support and it is shown as an important factor in improving of organizational commitment and performance and also realization of individual and organizational aims[37].Past studies have demonstrated that trust enhances people’s willingness to engage in spontaneous sociability such ascooperative and altruistic behavior [27].


Organizational trust can cause improvement and retention of employees by improving of communication and cooperation between employees and managers and by promoting teams’ efficiency. The employees say when they trust to their coworkers and managers, they feel ownership and commitment and become engaged with own job and organization [16]. The result of distrust will be creating behaviors such as rumors, conflict, political work, injustice, and low working in organization that takes a high energy from organization and increases the costs. In such an organization, it is useless to talk about issues such as self-management, self-controlling, cooperation, creativity, job involvement (job engagement), organizational commitment, total quality management, etc.the realization of organizational goals require member’s cooperation together; and the most important way to facilitate cooperation is that employees have mutual trust in each other and the same should be existed between employees and managers of organization as well [17].


Organizational commitment is one of the most investigated constructs in organizational research. Organizational commitment has become a highly researched job attitude in recent years including several meta-analyses [8;21,22].Organizational commitment is the individual’s psychological attachment to the organization. Commitment represents something beyond loyalty to an organization. It involves an active relationship with the organization such that individuals are willing to give something in order to contribute to the organization’s well-being Organizational commitment can be defined as a psychosomatic state that builds the workers behaviors in the organizations[18].


Organizational commitment also defined as a psychological state that indicates a tendency, need, as well as obligation to serve in an organization. Commitment of employees to the organization is generating intangible assets. In fact, commitment is the attitude and inner feeling of a person towards the organization, occupation or group that influences judgments, performance and loyalty toward organization. Employee with high commitment in organization not only reduces absence, delay and relocation but also considerably increase organizational performance, spiritual exhilaration of employees. Employees, who have more commitment might experience more discipline at workplace; and spend more effective time in the organization [32].


Organizational commitment can be conceptualized in terms of three distinct dimensions: affective, continuance and normative. The first dimension: affective commitment (desire to stay); It means internal and emotional attachment to organization. The person stays in organization because he\she has a positive attitude towards organizational goals and values. The first dimension is a commitment is caused due to emotional attachment and the individual is willing to continue his\her work in the organization [38].


The second dimension: continuance commitment; that relates to weighing the cost alternatives of leaving, and is defined as ‘‘the extent to which employees feel committed to their organizations by virtue of the costs that they feel are associated with leaving (e.g., investments or lack of attractive alternatives)’’. The person continues working in the organization because she/ he need the received. Based on cost-benefit analysis, the person concludes that he needs to stay in organization.


The third dimension: normative commitment; that relates to a sense of obligation, and is defined as “employees feeling of obligation to remain with the organization. This kind of commitment originates from the values of employed person in an organization. That is, the committed person is indebted to organization .No organization could ever achieve its goals without having committed human resources[14].


Justification of the study

Trust is crucial in all relationships formed within an organization, particularly in relationships between the staff and their managers. Trust, a crucial component of professional life has favorable consequences for both the staff and the organization. Trust has strong positive effect on commitment. Employees who are willing to be vulnerable to authorities tend to have higher level of affective and normative commitment. Also, people who are not committed to their jobs are likely to leave them. One reason that commitment also studied is that the impact of commitment is associated with work outcomes such as turnover, absenteeism, performance, motivation, and job withdrawal behaviors Hence, the research question raised in the present study was whether there are relationship between organizational trust and commitment among nurse managers.


Aim of the Study

The aim of this study was to assess the level of organizational trust among nurse managers, assess the level of organizational commitment among nurse managers and find out the relationship between organizational trust and commitment among nurse managers.


Subjects and Methods

Research design and setting

A descriptive, correlational design was used in this study, which was done in the medical and surgical departments of Ain Shams University Hospital, El-demerdash Hospital, Pediatrics Hospital and Obstetric Hospital which affiliated to Ain Shams University.


Subjects

The study sample used were all nurse managers in the study settings and consisted of 98 nurse managers who were available during the time of the study after exclusion of the 15 nurse managers (10%) included in the pilot study. The sample included 37 from Ain Shams University Hospital, 32 from El- demerdash Hospital, 14 from Pediatrics Hospital and 15 from Obstetric Hospital.


Tools of data collection

Trust Organizational Questionnaire (TOQ) to assess level of trust among nurse managers (Rudder’s 2003). The tool consisted of two parts; the first part was concerned with the socio-demographic characteristic of the studied group, while the second part included 18 statements to assess level of trust among nurse managers. These were classified into two types of trust as follow: trust in coworkers (8 items) and trust in organization (10 items).

The second tool was Meyer & Allen’s [24] Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) to assess level of organizational commitment among nurse managers. The tool consisted of three dimensions of organizational commitment including (affective commitment (10 items), continuance commitment (9) and normative commitment (8).The responses to each statement were on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.” These were scored 5 to 1, respectively. The scores of each area of rights were summed up and divided by the total number of items for conversion into a percent score.


Procedures

Official permission was obtained to perform the study after reviewing ethical aspects of the study by Faculty Ethics Committee. A Pilot was done on 10% of the sample of nurse managers, and accordingly the tools and data collection plan were finalized. These pilot subjects were not included in the main study sample. Data were collected all days of the week except Fridays starting from 9 am to 2 pm. Nurse Managers fulfilling study criteria in different departments on Ain Shams University hospitals were recruited. Informed consent was obtained from each participant after explaining the purpose of the study, and informing her about the right to refuse or withdraw from the study at any time. Confidentiality of the data was ascertained. And there weren't any limitations in the procedures.


Statistical analysis

The collected was revised, coded, tabulated and introduced to a PC using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 15.0.1 for windows; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, 2001). Data was presented and suitable analysis was done according to the type of data obtained for each parameter. Mean and Standard deviation (+ SD) and range for parametric numerical data, Frequency and percentage of non-numerical data. Chi square test was used to examine the relationship between two qualitative variables.


NOVA

It was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference of a parametric variable between means of more than two study groups.Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r):Correlation was used as a measure of the strength of a linear association between two quantitative variables.The Pearson correlation coefficient, r, can take a range of values from +1 to -1. A value of 0 indicates that there is no association between the two variables. A value greater than 0 indicates a positive association; that is, as the value of one variable increases, so does the value of the other variable. A value less than 0 indicates a negative association; that is, as the value of one variable increases, the value of the other variable decreases.


Results

Age NO % X2 P-value
40 Years> 7 7.1 87.204 *0.000
40-50 Years 76 77.6
Years 50< 15 15.3
Age Mean ±Sd .Min .Max Range
5.2±46.7 35.0 59.0 (59.0-35.0)
Years of Experience in Profession .NO % x2 P-value
ys 20> 6 6.1 87.755 **0.000
ys 30-20 76 77.6
ys 30< 16 16.3
Years of Experience in Profession Mean ±Sd .Min .Max Range
5.3±26.2 15.0 38.0 (38.0-15.0)
Deparment of Experience in Profession .NO % x2 P-value
ys 10> 11 11.2 36.265 **0.000
ys 20-10 59 60.2
ys 20< 28 28.6
Years of Experience in Department Mean ±Sd .Min .Max Range
7.2±18.2 4.0 36.0 (36.0-4.0)
Work Place .NO % x2 P-value
University Hospital 37 37.8 16.857 **0.001
El demerdash 32 32.7
Pediatrics Hospital 14 14.3
Obstetrics Hospital 15 15.3
Qualifications .NO % x2 P-value
Diploma 69 70.4 112.531 **0.000
Nursing Institute 3 3.1
Bachelor Of Nursing 18 18.4
Masters degree 8 8.2

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the studied Nurse Managers (n=98).


The socio-demographic characteristics of nurse managers in the study sample are presented in Table 1. Table (1) shows that more than three quarters of the participants (76.0%) were 40-50 years, (15.0%) were >50ys, while only (7.1%) were <40ys; the mean age of the participants was 46.7 + 5.2; In addition to that; more than three fourth of the participants (77.6%) had 20-30 years of experience in profession, (16.3%) had >30 years' experience while only (6.1%) had experience <20ys; the mean years of experience in profession is 26.2 + 5.3, while; (59.0%) of the participants had 10-20 years of experience in department, (28.6%) had >20 years' experience while only (11.2%) had experience in department <10ys; the mean years of experience in department is 18.2 + 7.2, Moreover; (37.8%) of the participants work in University, (32.7%) in El demerdash, (15.3%) in Obstetrics and Gynecology hospital, (14.3%) in Pediatrics hospital; (70.4%) of the study participants had nursing diploma, (18.4%) had bachelor of nursing, (8.2%) had master's degree; while (3.1%) graduated from nursing institute.


Organizational Trust Dimensions Percent Score
Mean ± SD
Organizational Trust among Coworkers
.OT1- There is an atmosphere for honest cooperation among workers. 18.7 ± 73.4
.OT2- Clear expectations connected with results and aims from all workers. 18.1 ± 68.9
.OT3-Workers are willing to share knowledge. 17.9 ± 71.6
.OT4- Workers openly admit and take responsibility for their mistakes. 19.4 ± 62.8
.OT5- Workers avoid participating in gossip and unfair criticism of others. 19.8 ± 62.6
.OT6- Workers are willing to take part in trainings. 19.0 ± 66.7
Total (Organizational Trust among Coworkers) 14.5 ± 67.7
Organizational Trust among Nurses Managers
.OT7- Periodic meetings take place between workers and the management. 19.0 ± 64.8
.OT8- In general the work responsibilities are established and clear. 17.2 ± 65.9
.OT9- The criteria of promotion are clear in every position. 20.0 ± 64.0
.OT10- Evaluation of workers is fair. 19.8 ± 58.7
.OT11- The relationship between workers is good. 17.8 ± 66.5
.OT12- All workers are treated fairly. 17.7 ± 62.8
.OT13- The interests of workers are taken care of. 18.3 ± 60.0
.OT14- Team work is encouraged and preferred. 19.2 ± 64.6
.OT15- Workers are encouraged to take part in decision-making. 20.4 ± 63.2
.OT16- Administration communicates decisions that are made to the workers. 20.7 ± 63.4
.OT17- Administration is concerned about improving workers' work conditions. 20.2 ± 62.0
.OT18- Development of human resources is considered a measure of success. 19.4 ± 64.8
Total (Organizational Trust among Nurses’ Managers) 12.8 ± 63.4
Total Mean % Score 11.6 ± 64.8

Table 2: Mean % Score of Organizational Trust Dimension (n=98).


Table 2 describes theMean %Score of Organizational Trust Dimension the mean % score of the Total (Organizational Trust among Coworkers) was (67.7 + 14.5), Total (Organizational Trust among Nurses’ Managers) was (63.4 + 12.8) and finally “Organizational Trust” Dimension was (64.8 + 11.6).Table 3shows that the mean % score of items reflecting affective Commitment generally range from (64.8 + 20.5 to 75.7 + 16.5). In addition to that; the mean % score of the “affective Commitment” Dimension was (70.7 + 12.7).


Affective Commitment Dimensions Percent Score
Mean ± SD
OC1- I feel happy through my work in the current organization 16.5 ± 75.7
OC2- I have a lot of proud whenever I talked about my organization 18.2 ± 72.4
OC3- I feel that my own goals are compatible with the goals of the organization that I work 17.5 ± 69.1
OC4- Fiduciary to my organization is not compensated by other alternative one 19.0 ± 71.2
OC5- Friendly atmosphere in my organization motivates me to stick and stay in it 19.2 ± 71.2
OC6- I feel an emotional attachment to the organization that I work in 19.4 ± 73.4
OC7- I feel part of the family make up this organization 19.3 ± 72.8
OC8- My values are compatible with the prevalent values in my organization 18.8 ± 66.9
OC9- My work gives me the chance to use my talents and skills 20.5 ± 64.8
OC10- My colleagues help me to develop the sense that I'm an important person in their work group 17.7 ± 70.7
Total Mean % Score 12.7 ± 70.7

Table 3: Mean % Score of Affective Commitment Dimension (n=98).


Table 2 describes theMean %Score of Organizational Trust Dimension the mean % score of the Total (Organizational Trust among Coworkers) was (67.7 + 14.5), Total (Organizational Trust among Nurses’ Managers) was (63.4 + 12.8) and finally “Organizational Trust” Dimension was (64.8 + 11.6).Table 3shows that the mean % score of items reflecting affective Commitment generally range from (64.8 + 20.5 to 75.7 + 16.5). In addition to that; the mean % score of the “affective Commitment” Dimension was (70.7 + 12.7)(Table 4,5).


Continuances Commitment Dimensions Percent Score
Mean ± SD
CC1-I will not accept working in another organization, even if the working conditions there are better 20.9 ± 65.1
CC2-I will stay in work, even if my colleagues preferred to work in another organization 19.7 ± 66.9
CC3-I have a willingness to continue in my current job until retirement age 19.5 ± 71.0
CC4-My life will confuse if I left my current job 20.6 ± 61.6
CC5-Not only the material gains that acquires my impulsiveness to work 21.7 ± 62.0
CC6-I will accept any assigned work to take it in return for continuing the work in this organization 21.0 ± 61.6
CC7-If there are jobs similar to mine, I prefer to continue in my current job 19.0 ± 64.8
CC8-I want to maintain the relationship that has between me and my colleagues at work 19.4 ± 71.8
CC9-I will think to leave work only for exceptional circumstances 20.3 ± 70.8
Total Mean % Score 13.9 ± 66.2

Table 4: Mean % Score of Continuances Commitment Dimension (n=98).


Normative Commitment Dimensions Percent Score
Mean ± SD
NC1-I have a strong bond with my work makes me stick to it 16.5 ± 73.8
NC2-My organization has a favor in building of practical experiences 19.6 ± 71.8
NC3-I am careful to help my organization in achieving its goals 17.6 ± 75.3
NC4-I feel that I have a strong commitment to continue to work in this organization 19.2 ± 71.6
NC5-This organization provides opportunities for workers to show their energies 20.3 ± 63.6
NC6-This organization is considered the place where I prefer to work in 20.1 ± 67.1
NC7-My emotional commitment to my colleagues motivates me to stay in this organization 17.3 ± 72.4
NC8-I keen to stay along in this organization 19.0 ± 7.06
Total Mean % Score 13.4 ± 70.8

Table 5:Mean % Score of Normative Commitment Dimension (n=98).ore of Normative Commitment Dimension (n=98)


Dimensions Weak Average High Chi-square
N % N % N % X2 P-value
Coworkers 14 14.3 53 54.1 31 31.63 23.408 **0.000
Management 14 14.3 74 75.5 10 10.2 78.694 **0.000
Total Organizational trust 9 9.2 75 76.5 14 14.3 82.673 **0.000
Affective commitment 5 5.1 56 57.1 37 37.8 40.673 **0.000
Continuances commitment 13 13.3 54 55.10 31 31.63 25.857 **0.000
Normative commitment 6 6.1 60 61.2 32 32.7 44.653 **0.000
Total Organizational Commitment 6 6.1 61 62.2 31 31.6 46.429 **0.000

Table 6: Level of organizational trust and commitment among Nurse Managers (n=98).


Table 6 shows Level of organizational trust and commitment among Nurse Managers. As Regard Coworkers Dimension Level (14.3%) Scored weak Percent Score, (54.1%) were average, (31.63%) were high; For Management Dimension; (14.3%) Scored weak Percent Score, (75.5%) were average, (10.2%) were high, For Total Organizational Trust Dimension; (9.2%) Scored weak Percent Score, (76.5%) were average, (14.3%) were high; For Emotional Commitment Dimension; (5.1%) Scored weak Percent Score, (57.1%) were average, (37.8%) were high; For Continuances commitment Dimension; (13.3%) Scored weak Percent Score, (55.1%) were average, (31.6%) were high; For Normative commitment Dimension; (6.1%) Scored weak Percent Score, (61.2%) were average, (32.7%) were high; and finally for Total Organizational Commitment; (6.1%) Scored weak Percent Score, (62.2%) were average, (31.6%) were high.


Socio demographic Characteristics No Total Organizational trust ANOVA
Mean ± SD F P-value
Age 40> 7 64.1 ± 10.3 1.183 0.311
50-40 76 64.1 ± 12.1
50< 15 69.1 ± 8.9
Years of Experience in profession 20> 6 63.8 ± 11.3 1.188 0.309
30-20 76 64.0 ± 12.1
30< 16 68.9 ± 8.3
Years of Experience in this department 10> 11 62.1 ± 6.3 0.581 0.561
20-10 59 64.6 ± 11.8
20< 28 66.4 ± 12.7
Work Place ( Hospital) University Hospital 37 59. ± 10.3 5.017 **0.003,
** (1,2),
*(1,3),
*(1,4)
El demerdash 32 69.3 ± 10.9
Pediatric 14 68.8 ± 13.9
Obstetric 15 66.7 ± 9.0
Qualification Diploma 69 65.7 ± 11.8 1.680 *(1,4)0.177
Institute 3 60.0 ± 13.8
Bachelor 18 65.9 ± 10.4
Master 8 56.8 ± 8.8

Table 7: Relation between organizational trust mean % score and demographic characteristics


Table 7 illustrates the relation between organizational trust mean % score and demographic characteristics. There is a statistically significant difference between organizational trust mean % score as regard their work place in addition to that there is a statistically significant difference between mean % score of diploma and master nurses (P<0.05); On the contrast; there is a statistically insignificant difference between organizational trust mean % score as regard their Age, Years of Experience in profession and Years of Experience in this department (P>0.05).


Socio demographic Characteristics No Total Organizational trust ANOVA
Mean ± SD F P-value
Age 40> 7 75.4 ± 10.3 1.790 0.173
50-40 76 68.1 ± 11.7
50< 15 72.0 ± 11.1
Years of Experience in profession 20> 6 75.6 ± 10.7 2.849 0.063
30-20 76 67.8 ± 11.9
30< 16 73.8 ± 8.7
Years of Experience in this department 10> 11 65.9 ± 5.6 1.190 0.309
20-10 59 68.7 ± 11.0
20< 28 71.7 ± 14.1
Work Place ( Hospital) University Hospital 37 65.2 ± 11.5 6.340 **(1,2),
**0.001,
*(2,4),
**(2,3)
El demerdash 32 75.8 ± 11.2
Pediatric 14 65.4 ± 7.2
Obstetric 15 68.7 ± 10.4
Qualification Diploma 69 70.2 ± 11.6 0.636 0.593
Institute 3 63.4 ± 14.2
Bachelor 18 67.7 ± 11.5
Master 8 66.6 ± 11.5

Table 8: Relation bet organizational commitment means % score and demographic Characteristics


Table 8 illustrates the relation between organizational commitment mean % score and demographic characteristics. there is a statistically significant difference between organizational Commitment mean % score as regard their work place (P<0.05); On the contrast; there is a statistically insignificant difference between organizational commitment mean % score as regard their Age, Years of Experience in profession, Years of Experience in this department and Qualification (P>0.05).


Dimensions Coworkers Management Total Organizational trust
R P-value r P-value R P-value
Affective commitment 0.457 **0.01> 0.356 **0.01> 0.453 **0.01>
Continuances commitment 0.366 **0.01> 0.348 **0.01> 0.409 **
Normative commitment 0.170 0.5< 0.352 **0.01> 0.330 **0.01>
Total Organizational Commitment 0.389 **0.01> 0.404 **0.01> 0.460 **0.01>

Table 9: Correlation bet total organizational trust and commitment among study sample (n=98)


Table 9 illustrates the correlation betweentotal organizational trust and commitment among nurse managers. There is highly statistically significant positive correlation between Total Organizational Trust & Total Organizational Commitment (P<0.01). However, there is a statistically insignificant correlation between organizational Trust among Coworkers and Normative Commitment (P>0.05).


Discussion

In research studies conducted on organizational trust, relationships between organizational trust and parameters such as performance, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and intention to quit employment, have been investigated, and positive results have been obtained for organizations. These studies have demonstrated that organizational trust had a positive impact on employee performance [10,15], confidence among employees and toward managers, increased job satisfaction [19,20], decreased absenteeism and intentions of quitting the job [5,36],increased commitment to the job and organization [36],heightened motivation , organizational commitment [12,13; 15.26].


The present study results indicated average level of trust among nurse managers in their management and coworkers and those they trusted more in their management. The finding is expected in hospitals of nurses with a high percentage of low level of education as in the present study sample, as level of education has its influence on their perceived societal value of the organization's production, the perception of the desirability of the mission, and the perception of the way the organization (through norms and past practices) as shown by [2], another studythat surveyed nurses showed that the nurses had a higher than average level (>4) of trust in their managers and coworkers. A study by [11], on nurses’ levels of trust in manager, nurses demonstrated that nurses’ levels of trust in their managers were above the average level [26],similarly reported that 64.5% of the nurses had managers who were capable of establishing a sense of trust within the team.


Affective commitment refers to employee's positive emotional attachment to the organization [38].The present study results indicated that more than half of nurse managers (57%)had average level of commitment to this dimension.[34] found that affective commitment had the highest score of organizational commitment dimension. Also, [20] found that affective commitment was more stable than continuous commitment. On the contrary, the study done by [1] found that half of the study subjects were totally not committed to this dimension.


Regarding continuance commitment the findings of the present study indicated that more than half of nurse managers (55%) had average level of commitment to this dimension. Also[4], concluded that normative and continuance commitment obtained the highest ranks. In the same line, the study done by [32,33] found that normative and continuance commitment obtained the highest ranks. On the contrary, the study doneby[25], found that continuance commitment had no effect, in addition to [34] who indicated that the study did not find any predictors for continuance commitment.


Regarding normative commitment the findings of the present study indicated that the majority of study subjects were committed to normative domain items. In the same line,[6,33], found that normative commitment obtained the highest ranks. The contrary, the study doneby [1], Found that the majority of study subjects were not committed to normative domain items.


According to the present study finding, there is a highly statistically significant difference between Level of organizational trust (Coworkers and management dimensions) and different Levels of commitment among Nurse Managers (Affective , Continuances and Normative commitment) (P<0.01). Findings revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between organizational trust mean % score as regard their work place in addition to that there is a statistically significant difference between mean % score of diploma and master nurse managers (P<0.05); On the contrast; there is a statistically insignificant difference between organizational trust mean % score as regard their age, years of experience in profession and years of experience in this department (P>0.05).


Findings of the present study revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between organizational commitment mean % score as regard their work place (P<0.05); On the contrast; there is a statistically insignificant difference between organizational commitment mean % score as regard their age, years of experience in profession, Years of Experience in this department and Qualification (P>0.05).on the same line, [34] found negative correlation between education and organizational commitment. Also,[23] found that there was no relation between organizational commitment and age. On the contrary, the study by [23] found a positive correlation between organizational commitment, working experience, and education.


Regarding Correlation between total organizational trust and commitment among study sample there is a highly statistically significant positive correlation between organizational Trust among Coworkers and Management, Total Organizational Trust & Emotional commitment, Continuances commitment, Total Organizational Commitment (P<0.01). However, there is a statistically insignificant correlation between organizational Trust among Coworkers and Normative Commitment (P>0.05).


Conclusion and Recommendations

The present study findings indicate that there is a highly statistically significant positive correlation between organizational trust and the three dimensions of organizational commitment. The implications of these findings are quite important as the future of public organizations rests in the creation of trust in management and the organization as a means of positively influencing not only quality of work life but efficiency and effectiveness of performance.


This would be through giving more emphasis to ethics and legal issues in nursing curricula, and organizations should improve their appreciation toward employees, because that enforces employees' commitment and appreciation towards their organizations and increases organizational belonging and loyalty culture. Researchers who want to conduct studies on this subject may be recommended to plan research studies that will seek organizational trust levels and commitment on different groups of nurses. Also, researchers may test in future studies the effectiveness of programs or interventions to increase organizational trust and commitment.


References

  1. Abd Elgaleel R (2015) Organizational Commitment among Nurse Teachers at Secondary Nursing Schools, Unpublished Master thesis, Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University.
  2. Altuntas S (2008) The relationship between nurses' organizational trust levels, and their personal professional characteristics and organizational citizenship behaviors. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  3. Ari GS (2003) Does the trust in manager increase organizational commitment? Journal of Commerce and Tourism 2: 17-36.
  4. Borghei R, Gholamreza J, Zarei MH, DastaniNasrin D (2010) An examination of the relationship between empowerment and organizational commitment. International 13: 425-441.
  5. Chen XP, Hui C, Sego DJ (1998) The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover: Conceptualization and preliminary test of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 922-931.
  6. Cho J, Laschinger HK, Wong C (2006) Workplace empowerment, work engagement and organizational commitment of new graduate nurses. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership 19: 43-60.
  7. Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Lepine J (2007) Trust, Trustworthiness and Trust propensity: A meta analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking & job performance. Journal of applied Psychology 9: 9-27.
  8. Cooper-Hakim A, Viswesvaran C (2005) The Construct of Work Commitment:Testing an Integrative Framework. Psychological Bulletin 131: 241-259.
  9. Demirel, Yavuz (2008) ÖrgütselGüveninÖrgütselBaglilikÜzerineEtkisi: TekstilSektörüÇalisanlarinaYönelik Bir Arastirma. Celal Bayar ÜniversitesiIktisadiveIdariBilimlerFakültesiYönetimveEkonomiDergisi 2: 179-195.
  10. Demircan N, Ceylan A (2003) The concept of organizational trust: Reasons and results. Journal of Management and Economy 10: 139-150.
  11. Demirtas SK, Bahcecik N (2006) Nurse managers’transformational leadership style and nurses’ trust in nurse managers. 3rd International Nursing Management Conference abstract book, Hacettepe University, Turkey.
  12. Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2002) Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J ApplPsychol 87: 611-628.[crossref]
  13. Eser G (2007) The effect of ethical climate and trust in manager on commitment to the organization. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara University Social Sciences Institute, Istanbul, Turkey.
  14. Gemlik N, Sisman F, Signri U (2010) The relationship between burnout and organizational commitment among health sector staff in Turkey.
  15. Halis M, Gokgoz GS, Yasar O (2007) Deterministic factors in organizational trust and a case study in banking sector. Journal of Social Sciences 17: 187-205.
  16. Javaheri MK (2009) “The impact of organizational justice, leader-member exchange (LMX), trust, and psychological empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)”. Police Human Development Bimonthly 6: 7-24.
  17. Khanifar H, Moghimi SM, Jandaghi GH, Zoorandi N (2009) “The examination of Relationship between components of trust and organizational commitment of employees (in The Education and Agriculture organization of Qom Province)”. Journal of Public Administration 1: 4-18.
  18. Lamba S, Choudhary, N (2013) Impact of HRM practices on organizational commitment of employees.
  19. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology 2: 407-423.
  20. Laschinger HK, Finegan J, Shamian J (2001) The impact of workplace empowerment, organizational trust on staff nurses' work satisfaction and organizational commitment. Health Care Management Review 26: 7-23.
  21. Liu MMA, Chiu WM, Fellows R (2007) Enhancing commitment through work empowerment Engineering. Construction and ArchitecturalManagement 4: 597-617.
  22. Mathieu J, Zajac D (1990) A review and Meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin 108: 171-194.
  23. Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsky L (2002) Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61: 20-52.
  24. Mohabati F, Keshtkaran V, Hedayati S, Hatam N, Fathi V, et al. (2013) The relationship between emotional intelligence with organizational commitment among senior and junior managers of educational hospitals of Shiraz 12: 60-69.
  25. Meyer JP, Allen NJ (1997) Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
  26. Navasivayam K, Zhao X (2007) An investigation of the moderating effect of organizational commitment on the Relationship Between Empowerment and Organizational Commitment in India. Tourism Management 28: 1212-1223.
  27. Ozer E (2007) Effect of leadership styles of managers with accreditation certificate working in private hospitals on factors in nurses’ quitting their jobs. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara University Health Sciences Institute,Istanbul, Turkey.
  28. Poon JML (2006) “Trust in supervisor and helping coworkers: moderating effect of perceived politics”. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21: 518-532.
  29. Paliszkiewicz, J (2010) Organizational trust – a critical review of the empirical research, w: Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management.
  30. Rahimnia F, Hasanzade Jaleh F (2009) “The moderating role of organizational justice on perception of organization politics and communication apprehension”. Transformation Management Journal 1:21-46.
  31. Robbins, Stephen P (2005) “Organizational behavior”, Eleventh edition, Prentice Hall of India.
  32. Ruder GJ (2003) “The relationship among organizational justice, trust, and role breadth self-efficacy”. Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Human Development.
  33. Sadeghi AG, Nawaser K, Vesal SM, Kazi R (2013) Which Organizational Culture Moves TowardsOrganizational Excellency. Asian Social Science 9: 221–236.
  34. Smith LM, Andrusyszyn MA, Laschinger HKS (2010) Effects of workplace incivility and empowerment on newly-graduated nurses’ organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Management 18: 1004-1015.
  35. Vacharakiat M (2008) The Relationships of Empowerment, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment among Filipino and American Registered Nurses Working in the USA. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis is University of George Mason.
  36. Westland AH (2004) "Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction in the Nordic countries”, Employee Relations 26.
  37. Yahyagil MY, Deniz Y(2004) Perceptions of employees working in a healthcare institution of organization climate and stress factors, and their intentions to quit jobs.AKose&OYarer (Eds), 2nd National Health Institutes Management Conference book.
  38. Yilmaz E (2006) Investigation of organizational trust level in schools with respect to ethical leadership characteristics of school managers and some variables. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Social Sciences Institute, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  39. Yucel I (2013) Does CEO transformational leadership influence top executive normative commitment? Journal of Business Research 67: 1170-1177.